A lot of good points in this one. Not sure I will be able to unsee this bias towards giftedness/privilege over effort, now that it's been made clear.
Of course, many have long complained about how film and TV give a very compressed view of success, leaving out all the hard parts and struggle in the middle. But I don't recall seeing anyone…
A lot of good points in this one. Not sure I will be able to unsee this bias towards giftedness/privilege over effort, now that it's been made clear.
Of course, many have long complained about how film and TV give a very compressed view of success, leaving out all the hard parts and struggle in the middle. But I don't recall seeing anyone point out this consistent preference for the privileged, gifted hero and how Hollywood contrasts these to the scrappy, upstart and sometimes hard-working and creative (to the point of kooky) villains.
It's almost as if Americans have a deep-seated longing for a the nobility of class-based society, as opposed to a true meritocracy. Is Hollywood right about this??
A lot of good points in this one. Not sure I will be able to unsee this bias towards giftedness/privilege over effort, now that it's been made clear.
Of course, many have long complained about how film and TV give a very compressed view of success, leaving out all the hard parts and struggle in the middle. But I don't recall seeing anyone point out this consistent preference for the privileged, gifted hero and how Hollywood contrasts these to the scrappy, upstart and sometimes hard-working and creative (to the point of kooky) villains.
It's almost as if Americans have a deep-seated longing for a the nobility of class-based society, as opposed to a true meritocracy. Is Hollywood right about this??