Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom's avatar
Jan 10Edited

A couple of thoughts here:

1. Regarding religiosity and attitudes towards adultery, I think the trend often goes the other way--people move away from religion as they try to justify libertine sexual attitudes, rather than developing more libertine sexual attitudes as they become less religious.

2. Part of the problem with the numbers cited in the WSJ article is that A. I'm not at all convinced that the government's inflation numbers reflect the reality on the ground, partially due to the fact that B. housing prices are insane right now, especially for people who are trying to get started. I'm about to close on a thousand square foot condo about twenty minutes from downtown in a major Texas metropolitan area, and I'm looking at paying close to $2,000 a month, albeit with some utilities and flood insurance paid for. (Also: that's with a 20k down payment on a $150k sales price.)

Further, this whole "30-somethings need to temper their expectations" schtick isn't complete nonsense, but the fact is that starter homes aren't to be found for love nor money once you get out of the backcountry--and while a lot of times it's easy to find a job there if you're thirtysomething, good luck finding a spouse.

Expand full comment
Felton's avatar

A quote from the male college enrollment article:

"Biology. While most STEM professions remain male dominated, 10 years ago biology became a 50/50 male/female split. By 2022, 62% of biology majors were women. Biology is now often considered the “easiest” of the STEM majors."

While discussions on how to manipulate grading to give girls an advantage over boys have been going on for decades, this more recent paper discusses how to give women an advantage over men in college biology courses even if they are less academically inclined:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320514083_Exams_disadvantage_women_in_introductory_biology

Basically non-exam assessments are less academic than exams but require greater conscientiousness and compliance. Girls in these biology classes tend to be slightly less academically inclined than the boys, this shows up in exams. The advice is to ramp up non-exam assessments to an absurd level to give girls the advantage. Basically boys are expected to be willing participants in courses designed to disadvantage them.

BTW, the papers basic argument that girls are disadvantaged by exams has been disproven around the world, particularly in the UK and Europe.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts